Monday, July 30, 2007

Freedom of Speech is Great... Unless Your'e Conservative, of Course


More proof that the far left is dangerous and a threat to the republic. This recent news article tells us how hard-left group Moveon.org now wants to intimidate advertisers who run ads on the Fox News Network.

I thought liberals were supposed to be open minded, and totally in favor of freedom of speech. For too many liberals though, freedom of speech is ok, as long as it's speech they agree with. They give lip service to the idea of free speech, but want to intimidate and remove all those whose speech they disagree with.

Its strange how these people are quick to point out the right wing slant on Fox, but love to deny or ignore the liberal/left wing slant found in the mainstream media as a whole, including the New York Times, National Public Radio, PBS, and to a lesser extent CBS, CNN and so many others. I guess its only bias if its a conservative bias; if its a left wing bias, its simply "the truth".
Its ironic that so many on the far left like to use the shrill Bush=Hitler rhetoric, but they dont see that their very tactic of trying to shut down conservative voices they disagree with is itself Nazi-like.

One day, we're going to have a White house, Congress, and Senate all controlled by the liberals, and when that day comes, God help America.

From the article:

Liberal activists are stepping up their campaign against Fox News Channel by pressuring advertisers not to patronize the network.
MoveOn.org, the Campaign for America's Future and liberal blogs like DailyKos.com are asking thousands of supporters to monitor who is advertising on the network. Once a database is gathered, an organized phone-calling campaign will begin, said Jim
Gilliam, vice president of media strategy for Brave New Films, a company that has made anti-Fox videos.

The groups have successfully pressured Democratic presidential candidates not to appear at any debate sponsored by Fox, and are also trying to get Home Depot Inc. to stop advertising there.
At least 5,000 people nationwide have signed up to compile logs on who is running commercials on Fox, Gilliam said. The groups want to first concentrate on businesses running local ads, as opposed to national commercials.


"It's a lot more effective for Sam's Diner to get calls from 10 people in his town than going to the consumer complaint department of some pharmaceutical company," Gilliam said.
....

Monday, July 23, 2007

I Guess Sometimes The Facts Dont Matter...


Ok. I'm going to rant again for a minute. I'm not the biggest George Bush fan out there, although I prefer him to pretty much all the Democrats. I do recognize that he's probably the most hated president ever, although I believe most of that hatred is irrational, a manifestation of what's sometimes called Bush Derangement Syndrome (BDS) .

I don't think its always been fair, and the liberal media has contributed in its own way to BDS. I remember how Ronald Reagan was hated too in his heyday, but the media gave him some grudging respect in the years after his presidency ended, and particularly after his death. On many issues, I have disagreed with Bush (especially on immigration, the border, and the North American Union issues ).

One fact that came to my attention today was really striking to me . A CNN reporter tonight on the program The Situation Room stated that the Bush administration had spent quadruple the amount of money on Africa than the previous administration. I don't know where he got that exact figure, but a little Google searching actually did make it pretty clear that Bush indeed has spend a lot more on African aid than Clinton did. Considering that the dislike for Bush seems to be greatest among the African-American community (yes, this is anecdotal), I find this very interesting. Listening to the many Democratic party and black activists, you'd almost think "George Bush doesn't care about black people" . But he spent a lot more on Africa than Bill Clinton, the man who many blacks lovingly call "America's first black president"! Who would have thought?

And don't get me started on the fact that the Clinton administration's veto of a more to send UN peace-keepers into Rwanda contributed to the death of 800,000 black Rwandans in 100 days!! No one called Clinton a racist for that, and I'm not saying he was - but I know if that was George Bush who had done the same thing he certainly wouldn't get a free pass the way Bill Clinton did.

The stereotype/fallacy that "Republicans are racist and Democrats are not" is part of what contributes to this kind of bias, blindness, and demagoguery, even in defiance of the facts. It's as if the facts don't matter, especially if they conflict with the preconceived notions people wish to hold on to.

Sure , you could always argue they could have done more but, personally, I appreciate the fact what this administration has done in terms of spending more on Africa than any other administration before it. Too bad they'll never get their proper due. But sometimes when you do the right thing , it doesn't matter if you get recognized for it or not.

Since the information on the White House website will probably change after next year's elections, I decided to post the relevant facts here,m for any who might be interested.
The facts speak for themselves. From http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/africa/accomplishments.html:

President Bush's Africa Accomplishments and Initiatives

I. GREATEST LEVEL OF ENGAGEMENT OF ALL ADMINISTRATIONS

  1. Meeting with 25 African Heads of State in First Two Years
    • President Obasanjo of Nigeria, May 11, 2001 at White House
    • President Mbeki of South Africa, June 26, 2001 at White House
    • President Moi of Kenya, June 27, 2001 at White House
    • President Kufuor of Ghana, June 28, 2001 at White House
    • President Wade of Senegal, June 28, 2001 at White House
    • President Konare of Mali, June 28, 2001 at White House
    • President Obasanjo of Nigeria, November 2, 2001 at White House
    • President Museveni of Uganda, November 10, 2001 at UNGA
    • President Ratsiraka of Madagascar, November 11, 2001 at UNGA
    • President Moi of Kenya, November 11, 2001 at UNGA
    • President Kabila of Dem. Rep. of Congo, November 11, 2001 at UNGA
    • President Mbeki of South Africa, November 11, 2001 at UNGA
    • President dos Santos of Angola, February 26, 2002 at White House
    • President Chissao of Mozambique, February 26, 2002 at White House
    • President Mogae of Botswana, February 26, 2002 at White House
    • President Museveni of Uganda, May 2002 at White House
    • President Mbeki of South Africa, September 13, 2002 at UNGA
    • President Kagame of Rwanda, September 13, 2002 at UNGA
    • President Kabila of Dem. Rep. of Congo, September 13, 2002 at UNGA
    • President Biya of Cameroon, September 13, 2002 at UNGA
    • President Deby of Chad, September 13, 2002 at UNGA
    • President Bongo of Gabon, September 13, 2002 at UNGA
    • President Obiang of Equatorial Guinea, September 13, 2002 at UNGA
    • President Patasse of Central African Rep., September 13, 2002 at UNGA
    • President Buyoya of Burundi, September 13, 2002 at UNGA
    • President Sassou-Nguesso of Rep. of Congo, September 13, 2002 at UNGA
    • President de Menezes of Sao Tome and Principe, Sept. 13, 2002 at UNGA
    • President Moi of Kenya, December 5, 2002 at White House
    • Prime Minister Meles of Ethiopia, Dec. 5, 2002 at White House
  2. First American President to Visit Africa in First Term - Trip in January 2003
  3. Bush Directed His Cabinet Secretaries to Have High Level Engagement in Africa

Five in First-term: Secretary Powell (May 2001, August 2002); Secretary Thompson; Secretary O'Neill; AMB Zoellick; Secretary Evans planned for November 2002

II. GREATEST LEVELS OF ASSISTANCE OF ALL ADMINISTRATIONS

  1. Core Development Assistance for Africa: Historic High Levels
    • 30 percent increase for sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) from 2001 to 2003
    • Over $1 billion ODA for SSA in FY03, highest level in U.S. history
  2. Millennium Challenge Account: Increase global development assistance by 50% over the next three years, resulting in $5 billion annual increase over current levels
  3. HIV/AIDS Global Funding: Historic High Levels and Climbing...
    • $988 million in FY2002, a 36% increase over FY2001
    • $1.1 billion in FY2003, doubles level of funding when he took office
    • $500 million to Global HIV/AIDS Fund, first and largest contributor

III. MAJOR POLICY INITIATIVES AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS

  1. Promote Health and Education; Combat HIV/AIDS, TB, Malaria
    • Created HIV/AIDS Cabinet Council co-chaired by Powell and Thompson
    • Jump-started Global HIV/AIDS Fund with first $500 million contribution, represents one quarter of the Fund's total resources
    • New $500M Mother and Child HIV Prevention Initiative
    • New $200M Africa Education Initiative to train over 400,000 teachers; provide 250,000 scholarships for African girls; and provide 4.5 million textbooks
  2. Promote Growth and Development; Eradicate Poverty
    • Implementing African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA); Provides over 90% duty free market access for African imports to the U.S. President Bush attended AGOA Forum in Washington, DC. Plans to attend Forum in Mauritius in 2003.
    • "Stop the Debt". IDA Grants Initiative for Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) to provide up to 50% of assistance to poorest in form of grants not loans.
    • Provided 18 percent increase to the African Development Bank's fund to assist the poorest-by far, the largest increase among the major donors.
  3. Promote Regional Peace and Stability; End Conflict and War
    [President Bush's leadership is directly responsible for progress ending wars in Sierra Leone, Sudan, and Congo
    • Appointed former Senator Danforth as Presidential Envoy for Sudan
    • Appointed Andrew Natsios as Humanitarian Coordinator for Sudan
    • Build the capacity of regional peacekeepers in Sierra Leone and Congo
    • Provided additional $55 million in FY2002 for combating terrorism in Africa
    • Launched $5 million awards program to track individuals responsible for genocide and terror acts in Central Africa. Three Apprehended since June 2002.

Friday, July 20, 2007

Hot Summer Ahead?


Another buried story. Our media apparently doesn't think its important news that the preseident of Iran, who once called for Israel to be wiped off the map, is calling for a "hot summer' in the Middle East, and the defeat for the "region's enemies" . Interestingly he says this standing side by side with President Assad of Syria.

This all comes not long after after one of Syria's top officials threatened/promised that Syria will confront Israel if they don't return the Golan Heights by September. As WorldNetDaily.com reports:

The Baath official said Damascus is preparing for anticipated Israeli retaliation following Syrian guerrilla attacks and for a larger war with the Jewish state in August or September. He said in the opening salvo of any conflict, Syria has the capabilities of firing "hundreds" of missiles at Tel Aviv.

"Syria passed repeated messages to the U.S. that we demand the return of the Golan either through negotiations or through war. If the Golan is not in our hands by August or September, we will be poised to launch resistance, including raids and attacks against Jewish positions (in the Golan Heights)," the Baath official said.

How many Americans have even heard of these comments by these leaders of Iran and Syria? I'd guess less than 5%. How many have heard this week about NFL quarterback facing charges for dogfighting and animal abuse? I'd guess maybe 90% + by now.

Will an armed conflict actually break out this summer between Iran/Syrian and Israel? We don't know for sure, and of course, we hope it doesn't. But when the leader of Iran makes veiled threats against Israel (and possibly the US?), isn't this something that we should be paying attention to over here? To me , thats a much more important story than hearing incessantly about an NFL quarterback facing charges for dogfighting.

Thank God for sites like WND.com , and similar independent news websites that tell us a lot of stuff that CNN, Fox News, etc don't feel like telling us. There's so much that goes on out there that our news media decides to filter out, and not tell the American sheeple people.

Thanks, Slate Magazine!!


While checking out the blog's statistics yesterday, I noticed a sizeable jump in the number of visitors over the past week. After checking out my website logs (thanks Statcounter) I noticed the majority of the newcomers had stopped by after reading an article on Slate.com that mentioned this blog. The article, entitled "Are You There, God ? It's Me, Hilary" made reference to my criticism of how the Democrats seem to have "found religion" for the 2008 campaign. The quote from Slate magazine:

Christian conservative Terry F. at The Endtime Observer sees nothing but cynicism and calculation in the Dems' divine tilt: "I'm sure they'll fool many people with this newfound emphasis on faith and values. But to me its a cynical attempt to appeal to people of faith by pretending to share similar values with them. They realize that the faith and values issue was a key to them losing to the Republicans in the 2004 presidential elections (according to to exit polling), so they've decided to have a more inclusive faith strategy going forward."

Yes, the article did bring a smile to my face. Its the first time the blog has gotten mentioned on what would be considered a mainstream website. Always feels good to have more people paying attention to what you're saying.

To all the new visitors, welcome. Feel free to bookmark us, look around, and come back again sometime. Those savvy in RSS can subscribe to this blog and receive updates automatically whenever new articles are added to the blog.

Those not familiar how to subscribe to a blog by RSS can check out the easy directions "TheMacdaddy" gives on his blog here.

Friday, July 13, 2007

Who's "Using Religion Now" ?


In my previous post I talked about how sickening it was to see Barack Obama trying to skillfully play the "faith" card as part of his campaigning strategy.

An article in this week's Time magazine shows that it's not just Obama's strategy, but a calculated Democratic Party strategy for the 2008 elections (and most likely beyond it). I'm sure they'll fool many people with this newfound emphasis on faith and values. But to me its a cynical attempt to appeal to people of faith by pretending to share similar values with them. They realize that the faith and values issue was a key to them losing to the Republicans in the 2004 presidential elections (according to to exit polling), so they've decided to have a more inclusive faith strategy going forward.

Their new game is simply: "See, we've got religion too!", but done in such a way that doesn't alienate the typical "secular progressives" who are the base and driving influence in the Democratic Party as a whole.

But thats all it is - its not genuine personal faith; its just a strategic ploy to appeal to people of faith. Sad and sickening is what it is, and its a shame that more people wont be able to see through this cynical strategy.
Left-wingers have long complained about conservative Christians and the political right wing supposedly using religion for political purposes. But really... who's "using religion" now?
Something tells me its going to be a long and disgusting campaign between now and November 2008.

From the article:

In this campaign season, if Clinton and Barack Obama and John Edwards are any measure, there will be nothing unusual in Democrats' talking about the God who guides them and the beliefs that sustain them. Clinton has hired Burns Strider, a congressional staffer (and evangelical Baptist from Mississippi) who is assembling a faith steering group from major denominations and sends out a weekly wrap-up, Faith, Family and Values. Edwards has been organizing conference calls with progressive religious leaders and is about to embark on a 12-city poverty tour. In the past month alone, Obama's campaign has run six faith forums in New Hampshire, where local clergy and laypeople discuss religious engagement in politics. "We talk about ways people of faith have gone wrong in the past, what they have done right and where they see it going in the future," says his faith-outreach adviser, Joshua DuBois. Speeches on everything from the budget to immigration to stem-cell research are carefully marinated in Scripture. "Science is a gift of God to all of us," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi during a debate on increased embryo-research funding, "and science has taken us to a place that is biblical in its power to cure."

The Democrats are so fired up, you could call them the new Moral Majority. This time, however, the emphasis is as much on the majority as on the morality as they try to frame a message in terms of broadly shared values that don't alarm members of minority religions or secular voters. It has become an article of faith among party leaders that it was sheer strategic stupidity to cede the values debate to Republicans for so long; that most people want to reduce abortion but not criminalize it, protect the earth instead of the auto industry, raise up the least among us; and that a lot of voters care as much about the candidates' principles as about their policies. "What we're seeing," says strategist Mike McCurry, "is a Great Awakening in the Democratic Party." ...

Monday, July 02, 2007

Barack and His Bogus "Faith" Strategy


I'm happy that America has progressed to the pont that a black man can be a serious contender for the presidential nomination of a major party. For that reason alone I find the candidacy of Barack Obama mildly heartwarming. But the warm fuzzy feelings end there.

I recognize him as a man full of platitudes, full of nice soundbites, but short on the depth and experience that should make a good president. To me its absurd that a man so lacking in gravitas could be so close to becoming the "leader of the free world", as they say.

But what really irks me with this guy is his calculated fakeness on the "faith" issue. If this ultra- liberal, pro-homosexual, pro-abortion guy is true man of faith, then I'm Moses.

Obama has taken more than a few shots so far (at times subtly, at times harshly), at the so called Christian Right; his use of the faith issue is the most prominent so far among the leading presidential candidates. He positions himself as someone with a kinder, gentler approach to "faith" than those cyncial hardliners on the Christian right. To Barack ""We" (him and people who are on his side) put their faith in action to truly make a difference in society, while "They" (read: Conservative Christians") just talk about faith and use it for divisive political purposes.

From his website:

"Barack Obama is a committed Christian and his faith informs his values. Barack believes that people of all faiths should come together to put their faith into action to change this country for the better. "

and

"When we ignore the debate about what it means to be a good Christian or Muslim or Jew; when we discuss religion only in the negative sense of where or how it should not be practiced, rather than in the positive sense of what it tells us about our obligations towards one another…others will fill the vacuum, those with the most insular views of faith, or those who cynically use religion to justify partisan ends."
– Barack Obama, Call to Renewal Keynote Address, June 2006
Also from Obama:
Addressing the 50th anniversary convention of his own denomination, the United Church of Christ, Senator Barack Obama of Illinois said Saturday that the religious right had “hijacked” faith and divided the country by exploiting issues like abortion, same-sex marriage and school prayer.—“But somehow, somewhere along the way, faith stopped being used to bring us together,” Mr. Obama said. “Faith started being used to drive us apart. Faith got hijacked.”…

Hmm. Watch for a lot more of this kind of rhetoric from him between now and election day, as well as stories of his "journey of faith". To me, this guy's fakesness is so striking to me, that its beginning to carry an odor to it. Perhaps it's been well said that this man is "the Paris Hilton" of the 2008 campaign.